« So It's Not Just El Paso It Seems | Main | A Sign That You Just Don't Get It »

July 25, 2011

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83452a92569e2014e8a1d950f970d

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference The Recall is Going to be a Mess:

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

I am not sure how you "keep someone from signing a petition" but Brown's campers should drop the Mayor recall and focus on the other two in time for Nov. The Mayor 6k signers will push it to May. Nov catches the wave, May may not. Albeit this issues has already lasted over two years.

Noting your good ideas David. We already have a PAC.

Well Jody - I'd put up some info where people can help out by giving to the PAC!

I told you folks that she's smart. She's one step ahead of me already!

David, are you under the belief that if the petition is successful, candidates would then run against the people currently in office?

Diana, from what I understand, if the petition is successful then the candidates would be put up to ballot (in or out). If they are voted out then they can run again in the special election against anyone else who wants to run (see Brown cronies). Talk about costly! The estimates are on the upwards of $500K to taxpayers. And if you want to oppose the recall and contribute to the Citizens Against Recall Petition, or CARP, e-mail saynotorecall@gmail.com

Diana,

Eventually an ousted politico would have to run for their seat again... or quit. But yes, if the petitions are succesful you'll be able to vote them out.

The mayor will be voted out for sure. The other two... maybe.

That doesn't mean i support the move to oust them, it just means I know how angry people are - for a variety fo reasons having nothing to do with the gay thing.

The incumbents will win.

The way I read your post, I thought you were saying it was all one election. I know that IF they present enough VALID signatures, then the recalls would go to election. If past, then a new election would take place. Jody, you are correct. What a costly mess. David, I disagree. Enough people still respect the Mayor. Texaswoman, I don't think it will even get that far. LisaT, if you are reading this, my hat is off to you for your comments at last week's meeting. They were true and right on target. I loved when you told that idiot "poor man walking" Salvador Gomez off about his medals. The look on his face was priceless! You go, girl!

Very well said David K: "it just means I know how angry people are - for a variety of reasons having nothing to do with the gay thing."

if you watched darren hunt's interview with byrd and hooten you would see that hooten has more common sense than anyone on council. his simple solution was to quit paying the dependent coverage for city employees. that solves the problem. however, you will never see any of council bring this to a vote. byrd had her chance and said nothing. hooten also did not think manny was out of line or in questioning mcnabb's conflict of interest on this issue. what's funniest to me about all of this is that rachel quintana(not the brightest bulb on council) questioned whether the issue would hurt retirees and no one else said nothing. not ortega the lawyer or mcnabb. did they know and stayed quiet hoping retirees would turn out in large numbers(in other words rolling the dice with that group of people) or did they sit quiet knowing that if it passed to deny that they would have an excuse to repeal it or that a judge would do so for them ? i agree with david that mayor cook would lose. his plumber statement along with overturning this vote has done him in along with trying to extend his term by trying to chang the term limits law. byrd's district wont vote her out, but didnt byrd sue the petitioner's the last time ? i wonder if she will do it again. ortega may have more problems than you think. east side voters dont like votes overturned either, but i still dont think it will be enough for him to lose.

angry person: you are exactly right. why doesn't someone on council approach Brown and say "if we discontinue paying any portion of dependent and spouse coverage" will you drop your recall petition effort"? If he agrees - then done. The $300-500,000 recall and special elections will cost would probably equal the increased cost the city may incur in a premium charge because this change would mess with their stop loss coverage and the premium deductions for that.

if the city were to go private insurance i believe there would be no stop loss charge. their pool would still be large enough for a great rate and i believe most would keep their insurance there because its no better anywhere else. if you read what hooten wrote to the times it sort of goes along with his theory that we are paying to much for benefits in the public sector. he alaso groups the private with it too considering unions.

http://www.elpasotimes.com/opinion/ci_18546633

I never hear a word Suzie Byrd says. Her giant, caterpillar eyebrows are too distracting.

Thank you, so tired of this. Very true. Angry seems to need counseling.

Wax on, Wax off, what a juvenile asinine remark. I do not care for Byrd but looks are irrelevant. Grow up!

Exactamente. Es el pensamiento bueno. Le mantengo.
http://www.blograpidfind.com/
DingoDogg

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment